In my daily conversations with friends and business associates the topic of how to deal with nasty customers comes up…. a lot. This can only tell me two things: 1) There are a lot of nasty customers out there and 2) No one really knows what to do with them.
We have clearly come to an age where the adage “the customer is always right” is tired, overused (or more truthfully underused), and more often plainly inappropriate. Customer abuse has become one of the leading reasons people in service industries chose to leave their employment. Business owners are recognizing the double edged sword that nasty customers are weilding. Their business can not survive without the customer, but nor can it survive with abusive customers. The consequences of nasty customers effect the bottom line. There is a real cost to the givings in that we do to accomodate these types. There is a detrimant to the human spirit of both management and worker, which in turns reduces effective work habits. There is the negative marketing campaigns that some nasty customers employ as a means to slander businesses. There is the loss of business from the customer that can’t be satisfied.
So, what are we to do about these nasty sorts?
As with everything, dealing with the nasty customer is a game in balance. Every effective manager has some idea of what is acceptable and what isn’t. The manager must make clear to each employee what they are to take from a customer, and what they must not take. Obviously every employee must know what they are authorized to do for a client in order to re-establish peace and good will.
One of the first steps in establishing these guidelines is to recognize at what point the company can tolerate giving in to the customer. If you offer refunds, discounts, extra work or other incentives to customers that yell, scream, or otherwise abuse your employees they will learn that in order to get what they want they must yell, scream, and abuse your employees. This tactic will become the first employable option, rather than the last resort. You will find yourself giving away the cow to sell the milk.
The second most important consideration is developing a measurable means to determine fault, the justifiability of the customer’s complaint, and appropriate means to rectify the situation. If you sold them a widget that you said did xyz and would be delivered in 3-5 days and it actually did not do any of x, y, or z and was delivered in 20 days you have no business being surprised at the customer’s response and have an obligation to make it right. In this example it would be appropriate to replace the product or offer a refund, however it would not be appropriate to give away ten more xyz’s without the customer paying for any of them. What can your first line customer service do and what can’t they? When is it appropriate to bring in a manager? What can the manager do?
But we all know that most of the time customer conflicts are not this cut and dried. The vast majority of the time customer complaints are generated from a series of unfortunate events. Typically they start with one or two miscommunications on the part of the business and the customer, and that if the situation stopped there and was reasonably handled, the customer would have been satisfied. Maybe not ecstatic, but satified nonetheless. Unfortuantely, the customer service team handling the original complaint do or say something that contributes further to the client’s wrath. A promise isn’t lived up to, the technical support isn’t helpful, the customer service phone line is always busy or backed up resulting in “perma-hold”, the customer is further inconvenienced by the solution. Whatever it is, this something added gives the customer the ammunition they need to bring up the original weapons and now you have a recipe for war.
There’s a myriad of simple things any employee can do to difuse angry customers. Make the customer feel heard, that the employee will take corrective action, that management is getting involved. Take the “kill them with kindness” approach. Say things like “I would be upset too”. When the customer is at fault or does not understand a fact, even partially, one bad habit many employees fall into is reapeating the script. First of all, if the customer didn’t understand it the first time, they probably won’t understand it the second time. But what’s more, it conveys to the customer that the employee doesn’t know any more than the “right words” they have been told and isn’t truly intetested in hearing their case or answering their concerns. Effectively communicating that you have a clear understanding calls for the ability to re-phrase, use synonyms, and apply your knowledge within the framework of your audiences vocabulary.
In some instances the customer may get so blocked by the individual they are speaking to that just hearing the same message from another voice helps it to sink in. If the customer is truly at fault or is making an unreasonable demand, ask a co-worker to help explain. Think of it psychologically, how many times did your father tell you something that offended you, but when your best friend told you the same thing you took it to heart? Thinking of it more impersonally, it goes back to the vocabulary. Once a situation has reached this point you have probably exhausted your own communicative resources. By allowing someone else to tell the story may give it just that little bit of difference that was needed.
So what does the business do when they decide that the client is no longer worth the time, expense, or energy it takes to manage the customer service? Popular opinion is to “fire the client”. How do you do this? What if you need that client later when business is slow? Will they ruin your reputation? How do you do this and avoid a conflict situation? These are all questions many business owners are struggling with on a daily basis. Tune in to our next edition to learn ways to cut a customer loose without losing the customer…..